Code is Law: Exploring the Intersection of Code and Traditional Law
Introduction
The concept of "code is law" has gained prominence in the realm of blockchain technology disputes and offenses, necessitating a reexamination of the applicability and limitations of traditional law in the blockchain sphere. This article delves into the history, relevance, and implications of 'code is law' on traditional legal systems, considering the increasing litigation surrounding blockchain technology.
What is code is law?
The notion of "code is law" asserts that the values and behaviors embedded in code govern interactions in cyberspace. Code, being binary, either implements or negates certain values, enabling or disabling specific behaviors. This perspective highlights the need for collective involvement in determining code values, ensuring a broader influence on its development.
Is code and law at odds with each other?
Code and law have fundamental structural differences that create tensions between them. Code operates in a binary and unambiguous manner, while legal rules are conceptual and require interpretation. Code lacks the ability to account for all possible eventualities, motivations, and moral considerations, unlike the flexible and inclusive nature of legal rules. Additionally, code's self-enforcing nature leaves no room for discretion, which can be crucial in complex human interactions.
Lessig's view - Major points of concern:
Lawrence Lessig, in his work "Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace," argues that cyberspace is not a lawless realm and that code regulates human interactions within it. He emphasizes the need to embed values consistent with traditional law in code development, ensuring that constitutional values are not overridden. Lessig's main concerns are that code can both enable and disable certain behaviors and that the collective participation of people is essential in shaping code to prioritize shared interests.
In brief, Lessig’s main points are as follows-
The nature of code can be both a vice and virtue. Code can be written to maintain anonymity in a way that is beneficial and detrimental ie.., to protect privacy and protect the identity of criminals. But, code can be altered, as such, code is “net fundamentally regulable”.
Values of traditional law must be embedded in the code’s architecture. Code must be governed and cannot be left unregulated.
Since code is written by people, governmental intervention is required to maintain constitutional values in cyberspace. People (coders) cannot be left to write code that does not prioritize shared interests.
References
https://cartorios.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/LESSIG._Lawrence_Code_is_law.pdf
https://abovethelaw.com/2019/08/code-is-law-should-software-developers-protect-our-freedoms/
https://journals.openedition.org/factsreports/4518
https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.02507
https://www.twobirds.com/en/insights/2021/germany/can-code-be-law
https://future.com/law-as-code/
https://openyls.law.yale.edu/handle/20.500.13051/17786
https://blogs.law.ox.ac.uk/business-law-blog/blog/2018/10/bridging-divide-between-code-and-law-distributed-ledger-ecosystems
https://www.quinnemanuel.com/media/u3hbmhhx/client-alert-code-is-law.pdf
https://www.brookings.edu/research/ethical-algorithm-design-should-guide-technology-regulation/
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0267364918301882
https://legal-tech.blog/is-code-law
https://www.canlii.org/en/on/onsc/doc/2021/2021onsc8581/2021onsc8581.html
https://www.blaney.com/articles/involved-in-a-cryptocurrency-dispute-powerful-civil-remedies-available-to-ontario-individuals?utm_source=mondaq&utm_medium=syndication&utm_term=Technology&utm_content=articleoriginal&utm_campaign=article
https://www.timesworld.com/articles/code-is-law-versus-code-as-law